Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Oocytes Vitrification Using Automated Equipment Based on Microfluidic Chip

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oocyte vitrification has a wide range of applications in assisted reproduction and fertility preservation. It requires precise cryoprotectant agents (CPAs) loading and removal sequences to alleviate osmotic shock, which requires manual manipulation by an embryologist. In this study, a microfluidic system was developed to facilitate the precise adjustment of the CPA concentration around the oocyte by linear loading and removal of CPA. In addition, the microfluidic-based automated vitrification (MAV) device combines CPA loading/removal process, with vitrification process, thereby achieving automated oocyte vitrification. Oocytes were vitrified by Cryotop/QC manual method and MAV method. The results showed that the survival, cleavage, and blastocyst rates of oocytes were 80.44, 54.17, and 32.95% for the MAV method, which were significantly higher than Cryotop manual method (73.35, 43.73, and 23.67%) (p < 0.05). In MAV, solution injection rate during CPA loading/removal process was designed as a 1-segment, 2-segment, and 4-segment function. Accordingly, three concave loading and convex removal protocols were adopted to vitrify oocytes. Oocytes vitrified using the 4-segment function group exhibited increased survival (86.18%), cleavage (63.29%), and blastocyst (45.58%) rates compared to those vitrified using the 1-segment and 2-segment groups. The oocytes vitrification with the highest concentration of CPA, denoted as VS1–TS1, exhibited the highest survival rate after rewarming (86.18%). In contrast, the VS3–TS3 group, characterized by a CPA concentration half that of VS1–TS1, exhibited lower survival (74.14%) and cleavage (59.31%) rates, but displayed the higher blastocyst rate (50.79%) following oocyte activation. Our study demonstrates potential of the MAV device for oocyte or embryo vitrification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Keros, V., and B. J. Fuller. Cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes: slow cooling and vitrification as successful methods for cryogenic storage. Methods Mol Biol. 2180:437–454, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gautam, S. K., V. Verma, P. Palta, et al. Effect of type of cryoprotectant on morphology and developmental competence of in vitro-matured buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) oocytes subjected to slow freezing or vitrification. Reprod Fertil Dev. 20(4):490–496, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Edgar, D. H., and D. A. Gook. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 18(5):536–554, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rienzi, L., C. Gracia, R. Maggiulli, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 23(2):139–155, 2017.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolton, V. N., C. Hayden, M. Robinson, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation: revised evidence for practice. Hum Fertil (Camb). 26(1):2–16, 2023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, G. D., P. C. Serafini, J. Fioravanti, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification. Fertil Steril. 94(6):2088–2095, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwon, G. H., G. S. Jeong, J. Y. Park, et al. A low-energy-consumption electroactive valveless hydrogel micropump for long-term biomedical applications. Lab on a Chip. 11(17):2910–2915, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miao S, Guo C, Jiang Z, et al. Development of an open microfluidic platform for oocyte one-stop vitrification with cryotop method. Biosensors (Basel), 2022, 12(9).

  9. Miao, S., Z. Jiang, J. Luo, et al. A robotic system with embedded open microfluidic chip for automatic embryo vitrification. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 69(12):3562–3571, 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai G, Jiang B, Zhu J, et al. Design of a controllable push-triggered microfluidic chip for vitrification reagent loading/unloading. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 16th International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS), F 25-29 April 2021, 2021.

  11. Tirgar, P., F. Sarmadi, M. Najafi, et al. Toward embryo cryopreservation-on-a-chip: A standalone microfluidic platform for gradual loading of cryoprotectants to minimize cryoinjuries. Biomicrofluidics.15(3):034104, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heo, Y. S., H. J. Lee, B. A. Hassell, et al. Controlled loading of cryoprotectants (CPAs) to oocyte with linear and complex CPA profiles on a microfluidic platform. Lab Chip. 11(20):3530–3537, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo, Y., Y. Yang, X. Yi, et al. Microfluidic method reduces osmotic stress injury to oocytes during cryoprotectant addition and removal processes in porcine oocytes. Cryobiology. 90:63–70, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miao, S., Z. Jiang, J. Luo, et al. A robotic system with embedded open microfluidic chip for automatic embryo vitrification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 69(12):3562–3571, 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J., C. Shi, J. Wen, et al. Automated vitrification of embryos: a robotics approach. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 22(2):33–40, 2015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arav, A., Y. Natan, D. Kalo, et al. A new, simple, automatic vitrification device: preliminary results with murine and bovine oocytes and embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 35(7):1161–1168, 2018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Antinori, M., E. Licata, G. Dani, et al. Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries. Reprod Biomed Online. 14(1):72–79, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuwayama, M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 67(1):73–80, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, J., J. Cui, X. Ling, et al. Vitrification of mouse embryos at 2-cell, 4-cell and 8-cell stages by cryotop method. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 26:621–628, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou, X., Y. Du, X. Yi, et al. Optimization of cryoprotectants addition and removal protocols using microfluidic chip. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 38(06):719–725, 2019. ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cobo, A., and J. A. García-Velasco. Why all women should freeze their eggs. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 28(3):206–210, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cobo, A., J. A. García-Velasco, A. Coello, et al. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 105(3):755-764.e758, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cobo A, Garrido N, Pellicer A, et al. Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate. Fertil Steril. 104(6):1426-1434.e1421-1428, 2015.

  24. Nagy, Z. P., C. C. Chang, D. B. Shapiro, et al. The efficacy and safety of human oocyte vitrification. Semin Reprod Med. 27(6):450–455, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dal Canto, M., C. Moutier, F. Brambillasca, et al. The first report of pregnancies following blastocyst automated vitrification in Europe. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 48(7):537–540, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu, Y., Q. J. Zhang, H. L. Feng, et al. Automation in vitrification and thawing of mouse oocytes and embryos. Front Cell Dev Biol. 11:1330684, 2023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Miao S, Xu J, Jiang Z, et al. Microfluidics-enabled robotic system for embryo vitrification with real-time observation: design, method, and evaluation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1-11, 2023.

  28. Zhao, G., Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, et al. A microfluidic perfusion approach for on-chip characterization of the transport properties of human oocytes. Lab Chip. 17(7):1297–1305, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Guo, X., Z. Chen, K. Memon, et al. An integrated microfluidic device for single cell trapping and osmotic behavior investigation of mouse oocytes. Cryobiology. 92:267–271, 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lai, D., J. Ding, G. W. Smith, et al. Slow and steady cell shrinkage reduces osmotic stress in bovine and murine oocyte and zygote vitrification. Hum Reprod. 30(1):37–45, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Y, Yu Z, Zhou X, Microfluidic system for vitrification of oocytes. Journal of Refrigeration, 43(06):160-166 (in Chinese), 2022.

  32. Li, X., Y. K. Wang, Z. Q. Song, et al. Dimethyl sulfoxide perturbs cell cycle progression and spindle organization in porcine meiotic oocytes. PLoS One.11(6):e0158074, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Vincent, C., S. J. Pickering, M. H. Johnson, et al. Dimethylsulphoxide affects the organisation of microfilaments in the mouse oocyte. Mol Reprod Dev. 26(3):227–235, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou, D., X. Shen, Y. Gu, et al. Effects of dimethyl sulfoxide on asymmetric division and cytokinesis in mouse oocytes. BMC Dev Biol. 14:28, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Larman, M. G., C. B. Sheehan, and D. K. Gardner. Calcium-free vitrification reduces cryoprotectant-induced zona pellucida hardening and increases fertilization rates in mouse oocytes. Reproduction. 131(1):53–61, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vincent, C., S. J. Pickering, and M. H. Johnson. The hardening effect of dimethylsulphoxide on the mouse zona pellucida requires the presence of an oocyte and is associated with a reduction in the number of cortical granules present. J Reprod Fertil. 89(1):253–259, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Santos, N. C., J. Figueira-Coelho, J. Martins-Silva, et al. Multidisciplinary utilization of dimethyl sulfoxide: pharmacological, cellular, and molecular aspects. Biochem Pharmacol. 65(7):1035–1041, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Verheijen, M., M. Lienhard, Y. Schrooders, et al. DMSO induces drastic changes in human cellular processes and epigenetic landscape in vitro. Sci Rep. 9(1):4641, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hunt, C. J. Cryopreservation of human stem cells for clinical application: a review. Transfus Med Hemother. 38(2):107–123, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Marks, P. A., and R. Breslow. Dimethyl sulfoxide to vorinostat: development of this histone deacetylase inhibitor as an anticancer drug. Nat Biotechnol. 25(1):84–90, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, J., G. Y. Lee, J. D. Biggers, et al. Low cryoprotectant concentration rapid vitrification of mouse oocytes and embryos. Cryobiology. 98:233–238, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biothermal Science & Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China

    Jing Shen, Zixuan Yu, Weijie Li & Xinli Zhou

  2. Shanghai Co-innovation Center for Energy Therapy of Tumors, Shanghai, 200093, China

    Jing Shen, Weijie Li & Xinli Zhou

  3. Shanghai Technical Service Platform for Cryopreservation of Biological Resources, Shanghai, 200093, China

    Jing Shen, Weijie Li & Xinli Zhou

Authors
  1. Jing Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zixuan Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weijie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinli Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinli Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Additional information

Associate Editor Brendon Baker oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, J., Yu, Z., Li, W. et al. Oocytes Vitrification Using Automated Equipment Based on Microfluidic Chip. Ann Biomed Eng 53, 471–480 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03623-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03623-9

Keywords